program
cappa_program_final_13_06_2016.pdf | |
File Size: | 163 kb |
File Type: |
5ième Conférence canadienne annuelle ACPAP / 5th
Annual Canadian CAPPA Conference
Démocratie et action collective : Quels grands enjeux pour la gestion et les politiques publiques?
Democracy and
collective action: What are the big issues for public management and policy?
École nationale d’administration publique
555
Boulevard Charest Est, Ville de Québec, QC G1K 9E5
16-17 mai/May 2016
Lundi/Monday,
16 mai/May 16th
7:45 – 8:30 Inscription
et petit-déjeuner/ Registration and
Breakfast (Hall)
8:30 –8:45 Ouverture/
Welcome
(Hall)
Nelson Michaud, Directeur général, ENAP
Kathy Brock (CAPPA President, Queen’s University)
Isabelle Fortier (Comité organisateur/Conference Organizing Committee,
ENAP)
8:45 – 10:15 Séance
plénière/ Plenary
(Amphithéâtre)
Texte commenté/ Commented text :
Henry Mintzberg et Jacques Bourgault (2000) Manager en public/Managing Publicly, IPAC.
Commentaires/Comments : Luc
Bernier, ENAP, Amanda Clarke, Université Carleton,
Luc Juillet, Université d’Ottawa, Ken Rasmussen, University of Regina,
Réplique aux auteurs/Authors’ comments : Jacques
Bourgault
10:15 – 10:30 Pause santé/Health Break
10:30 – 12:00 Séance
plénière Plenary (Amphithéâtre)
Éducation et enseignement/Education and Teaching
Naomi Couto, Coordinator, York Collegium for
Practical Ethics
School of Public
Policy and Administration, York University
Naomi Couto
Education and Teaching Public Policy:
Neoliberalism, the
Democratic Deficit, and the Destruction of the Citizen
The study of public policy must be more than a
functional analysis or evaluation of policy; it must include the study of
politics and social context. As Frances Fukuyama announced, liberal,
democratic, capitalism represented the social form at the end of history.
However, in the years following the late 80s, and especially into the 21st
century, the neoliberal empire has been plagued by discontent and disruption,
which has threatened its collapse. the Thatcher-Reagan mantra which claims
‘there is no alternative’ has become problematic. This is not because
alternatives to the neoliberal system are clear and well defined, but rather
because it is clear that alternatives are necessary. The cultural sphere which
makes up our world is, therefore, a world currently defined by neoliberal
beliefs that prevent the emergence of true alternatives. The difficulty is, of
course, creating this world, when the contemporary education system is
organised around neoliberal capitalist values. Here, what matters above all is
results – schools, colleges, and universities are defined by the need to
deliver results that are economically measureable, represent value for money,
and perhaps most importantly contribute to the economic good of capitalist
society. Through an exploration of these areas, the issue aims to explore the
possibility of the creation of an educational system and educational
institution able to socialise citizens who are committed to democratic change
and production of a society that values equality, freedom, and hope. We believe
that this is an important issue in contemporary society.
Round table on teaching public management
and public policy today |
||
Teaching Management and Public Policy
Strategies for
elevating scholar-practitioner collaboration
Michael O’Neill, Ian Macdonald & John
Wilkins, York University |
Utilizing the Case Study Method to Illustrate the Efficacy of
Democratic Administration in Addressing the “Big Issues” in Public Policy,
Management and Administration” Dr. James C. Simeon, York University |
When the workplace is the classroom for
both faculty and students: Lessons in experiential education Faculty use of job shadowing as source of
inspiration for pedagogy in teaching public administration. Peter
Constantinou, York University |
12:00 – 13:15 Lunch/Lunch Salle
à manger-rez-de-chaussé / Lunch room-ground floor
13:15 – 14:45 Ateliers
parallèles/Break-Out Panels
Panel A Local/room 3114 |
Panel B Local/room 3128 |
Panel C Local/room 3112 |
Chair Evert Lindquist Table
Ronde/Roundtable: Digital Era Governance in Canada:
Issues and Research Implications Amanda
Clarke
(Carleton) on ‘Policy Analysis and Design in the Digital Era’. Dylan Marando (Toronto) on
‘Advising Elected Leaders in the Digital Era’. Justin
Longo
(Regina) on ‘Engaging Citizens and Stakeholders in the Digital Era’. David
Brown
(Ottawa) and
Sandra Toze (Dalhousie) on
‘Information Governance and Management in the Digital Era’. Patrice
Dutil
(Ryerson) on ‘Regulation in the Digital Era’. Jeffrey
Roy (Dalhousie) on ‘Evolving Models of Service Delivery in the
Digital Era’ (presented by Evert Lindquist). Evert
Lindquist (Victoria) on ‘Accountability in the Digital Era’. |
Chair Ian Roberge Problématisation et réforme du contrôle
externe de la police au Québec et en Colombie-Britannique André Bernier, doctorant,
Université d’Ottawa Reconciliation between Aboriginal People
and Police Services in the Greater Toronto Area Daniel
Cohn, York University L'incapacité de l'action
publique à reconnaître et agir sur les risques imminents: étude de cas de la
tragédie de lac-mégantic. Anais.ValiquetteLHeureux, doctorante, ENAP Révolution ou mot à la mode :
représentation et instrumentation de la résilience en gestion de crise Julie-Maude
Normandin, doctorante, ENAP |
Chair Andrea Rounce Les défis de
l’articulation entre action publique et action collective locales Gérard
Divay et Youssef Slimani, ENAP Les rôles de l’État et
des acteurs non gouvernementaux dans l’action collective : la régulation
des résidences privées pour aînés au Québec Louis Demers, ENAP Snapshots of Precarity: Life Histories,
Organizational Narratives, and Public Service Internships in Ontario Olivia Waterman, MA
candidate, University of Ottawa A
big issue for public management education: How
to use the MPA curriculum to combat social inequalities Blue Wooldridge, Virginia Commonwealth University |
14:45 – 15:15 Pause
santé/Health Break
15:15 – 16:45 Ateliers
parallèles/Break-Out Panels
Panel A Local/room 3114 |
Panel B Local/room 3128 |
Panel C Local/room 3112 |
Chair Robert
Shepherd Innovation as
methodology: Rethinking innovative processes in public service organizations Kathy L.
Brock, Queens University, Bryan
Evans, Ryerson university, Andrea
Migone, IPAC Démocratie et maturation organisationnelle Lilly Lemay, ÉNAP L’évaluation des politiques publiques dans un
contexte d’optimisation : les défis d’une vision au carrefour de la gestion
publique et des politiques publiques Jean-François
Savard, ENAP, Geneviève
Tellier, Université d’Ottawa Describing the Elephant: Slouching toward a
Methodology for a Meta Study Hafiz Rahman, Thompson
Rivers University Zéna Seldon, Thompson Rivers University
|
Chair
Patrice Dutil The Evolution of
Governance: Oversight, Accountability and Risk Karl
Salgo, Executive Director, Public Governance,
Institute on Governance The Government of the Future – Taking Stock
of the Big Picture Ian Roberge, York
University Good government must be intelligent government Michael Atkinson, Murray Fulton, Johnson-Shoyama Graduate
School of Public Policy Une administration étatique plus souple et plus démocratique ? ou constamment plus complexe et plus
contraignante? Isabelle
Caron, doctorante, Université d’Ottawa. |
Chair Daniel J. Caron Information Resources
Management: At the Heart of Modern Institutional Democratisation? The Limits of
Information Daniel
J. Caron, ENAP Transformations in
Information Resources Management Professional Practices within the Government
of Canada Pierre Desrochers, Ph.D.Candidate,
Université de Montréal. Assessing the
Effectiveness of Information Resources Management as an Asset for
Governmental Transparency Daniel J. Caron, ENAP, Robert P. Shepherd, Carleton
University, |
17:00 – 18:00 Plénière/Plenary
(Amphithéâtre)
James Iain
Gow, professeur émérite, Université de Montréal
History of public
administration theory and practice provide new tasks for Governance theory.
Although there are good reasons to prefer a
governance approach to politics, and since, by its very nature, getting an
overall picture of governance practices is difficult, experience and history
reveal some important unresolved problems that cannot simply be wished away. It
is a new age, to be sure, but the search for recurrent patterns in the past may
help point the way to adequate solutions. Governance shows weaknesses in its
lack of interest in representative government, its lack of concern for inequality,
due process and justice. A polycentric system has strengths that a rigid
centralized one does not possess, but a central government capacity is needed
to preserve boundaries, protect the country’s interests and offer institutions
capable of defining the public interest case by case, in more or less precise
terms, develop and choose among grand options, act as court of last resort and
as guardian of fairness and justice. Its differences mean that the work of
public servant is different from that of employees in other economic and social
institutions. The state remains different from all other social institutions.
18:00 – 19:00 Cocktail (Hall
ENAP)
19:00-20:00
Temps libre/free time At the bar and terrasse available to us in front of
Room C Hotel Pur
20:00 – 22:00 Banquet/Dinner (Salle C/ Room C Hôtel Pur)
Mardi 17 mai/Tuesday, May 17th
8:00 – 8:30 Petit-déjeûner/Breakfast
(Hall)
8:30 – 9:15 Table
ronde/Roundtable (Amphithéâtre)
Katherine A. H. Graham, Carleton
University, facilitator
Panelists: Kathy Brock, Queens University,
Robert Shepherd, Carleton University,
and David Newhouse, Trent University
Sharing the Land, Sharing a Future
The roles of Canadian programs in public policy and
administration
Since the
release of the Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP) in
1996, there have been repeated calls on governments, institutions and citizens
to renew the relationship with Aboriginal Peoples based on principles of mutual
recognition, mutual respect, sharing and mutual responsibility. The report of
the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) cited the bold path set out by
RCAP and produced its own comprehensive 94 Calls to Action. The current federal
government has committed to implement the report of the TRC and has endorsed a
“nation to nation relationship” with First Nations, Metis and Inuit. These
milestones relate directly to the three big themes of the 2016 CAPPA
Conference: the roles of the state and of non-governmental institutions in
collective action; the transformation of systems and institutions; and
different approaches to the above issues in research and education. The goal of
this roundtable is to foster deliberation within CAPPA about the implications
for member schools and programs of the reassertion of the RCAP principles and
nation to nation paradigm, the TRC’s calls to action and the current federal
commitments. The results of these
deliberations will inform a broader national dialogue, to occur in November
2016.
Questions
to be discussed include: How best to incorporate Indigenous histories and the
history of past relations between First Nations, Metis and Inuit peoples and
governments in Canada into curriculum; How to engage students, faculty and
others attentive to our schools and programs in thinking about establishing
better practices and relations to achieve better policy and program outcomes
across the sphere of governance; and How can we work better together? How can
schools and programs in public policy and administration contribute more
broadly to the process of reconciliation?
9:30 – 10:45 Ateliers
parallèles/Break-Out Panels
Panel A Local/room 3114 |
Panel B Local/room 3128 |
Panel C Local/room 3112 |
Chair Lilly Lemay Instrumentation et expression
de biens communs territorialisés : le cas du territoire madelinot Fauré, Anne, doctorante, ÉNAP La gestion participative
et territorialisée peut-elle changer l’action publique agricole ? Le cas de
l’agroenvironnement dans deux régions françaises Maude
Benoit, Université Concordia, Caroline Patsias, UQAM Climate change policy and
governance in Canada: What can we learn from the provinces? Brendan Boyd, University of Calgary Entre pluralisme et
néocorporatisme : le
modèle québécois de concertation comparé Jean-Patrick
Brady, Doctorant, ÉNAP |
Chair Jonathan
Craft Public Servants’ Political Activities in the 42nd
Parliamentary Election Andrea D. Rounce University of Manitoba The Clerk, Deputy Ministers and Communications in the Federal
Government Bryan Evans, Ryerson
University, Robert Shepherd, Carleton University. Does
Canada
Have a Constitutional Public Service? Ken Rasmussen,
University of Regina Canadian
Public Policy CS/Memex Justin Longo,
University of Regina |
Chair Jean-François
Savard La construction d’un service public :
Les rapports inter-gouvernementaux et le développement du champ muséal au
Canada et en Australie Jonathan Paquette,
Université d’Ottawa, Stephen Boyle, University
of South Australia, Carmen Reaiche,
University of Adelaide L’ethos public: un regard croisé
Canada/Suisse sur l’expérience des cadres supérieurs Isabelle Fortier,
ENAP, Yves Emery,
Université de Lausanne Opening Government under Stephen Harper Amanda
Clarke Carleton University The post-devolution demise of partnership
engagement In labour market matters in canada Donna E. Wood, University Of Victoria |
10:45 – 11:00 Pause
santé/Health Break
11:00
– 12:30 Ateliers
parallèles/Break-Out Panels
Panel A Local/room 3114 |
Panel B Local/room 3128 |
Panel C Local/room 3112 |
Chair Robert Shepherd Coping with Death:
Assisted Suicide as a Public Management Problem Kathy
Brock, Queens University Regulating the
“Sins”: Tobacco, Alcohol, Gambling and Marijuana Regulation in Canada Malcolm G. Bird, University of Winnipeg Patrice Dutil, Ryerson University Chris Stoney, Carleton University Digital
Information Revolution Changes Canada In E-Government Design, the Battle
against Illicit Drugs, and Health Care Reform Scarlett Kelly,
Dalhousie University Ambiguous
Agreement? Attitudes to Homelessness Policy Interventions in Canada Carey
Doberstein, UBC, Alison Smith, PhD candidate, Université de
Montréal |
Chair Daniel Cohn Charting New Accountability Paths to
Fairness and Equity: The Case of the Toronto City Ombudsman 2010-2014 Marc Yvan Valade, Ryerson University Andrea Noack, Ryerson
University Myers Siemiaticky, Ryerson University Jocelyn Kane, Ryerson University Beyond Assurance: What value does internal auditing bring to the public
sector? Luc Juillet, University of Ottawa Towards Horizontal Accountability: Pitfalls and Potentials Charles Conteh, Brock University La reddition de comptes comme leviers d’apprentissage et de
communication de la décision : contexte de l’administration publique Robert
Poirier, doctorant, ENAP |
Chair Luc Bernier L’influence des
programmes d'infrastructures du gouvernement fédéral sur la planification
financières des municipalités ontariennes et québécoises Eric Champagne, Université d’Ottawa Charles-Étienne Beaudry, Université d’Ottawa Efficience, équité ou considérations électorales?
Les déterminants de la distribution des transferts intergouvernementaux entre
les municipalités québécoises. Kaddour
Mehiriz. Institut national de la recherche scientifique Poverty Reduction
Strategies in Canada – Just another institutional layer or a promising way to
solve a wicked
problem? Geranda
Notten, University of Ottawa Multiculturalisme et politiques du
patrimoine : reconnaissances symboliques des artistes migrants au
Canada Sébastien
Pelletier, doctorant, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, France |
12:30 – Lunch & 13:00 – 14:00 ACPAP
AGA/CAPPA AGM (Lunch Room-ground floor)
14:00 – 15:30 Ateliers
parallèles/Break-Out Panels
Panel A Local/room 3114 |
Panel B Local/room 3128 |
Panel C Local/room 3112 |
Chair Daniel Béland Addressing Contemporary Health and Social Policy
Challenges Ideas, Institutions, and the Politics
of Federalism and Territorial Redistribution Daniel
Béland,Johnson-Shoyama, Graduate School of Public Policy André Lecours,
University of Ottawa Managing Patient
Demand in a Global Healthcare Market: Today’s Challenges for
Health Policy Leaders Amy Zarzeczny,
Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy Social Policy in
Active Living Promotion: Are We Widening the Gap? Tarun Katapally,
Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy Cyberbullying:
What’s the Problem? Kathleen McNutt, Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School
of Public Policy |
Chair Evert Lindquist Inside
the Minister’s Office: Who does what? Peter
P. Constantinou, York University The Role of
Academic Research in Policymaking Andrea Migone, IPAC Kathy Brock, Queens
University Ideas, Resiliency and the Parapublic
Service: A Methodology for the Criticism of Government Publications Éric Lyall Nelson, PhD candidate, University of
Ottawa Understanding Influence in Federal Decision-Making: Effects of NPG? Robert
Shepherd, Carleton University Christopher
Stoney, Carleton University Lori
Turnbull, lecturer, Carleton University |
Chair Ken Rasmussen Citizen
Participation in Policy-Making Through Litigation: Sometimes Democratic and Mobilizing Ian Greene, York University Urban Village 2.0 is a
solution to urban challenges related to job creation and affordable housing Diane Simsovic, Carleton University, Maude Marquis-Bisonnette, PhD candidate, Carleton University The Significance of Employment Policies to Cultural Policies Robin Nelson, PhD
Candidate, University of Ottawa An archaeology of l’écomusée: Exploring the social action
museum Christopher Gunter, PhD
candidate, University of Ottawa |
15:30 – 16:00 Mot
de cloture/Closing address (Hall)